Showing posts with label bad theater. Show all posts

Insane Clown Posse: Steven Colbert On Capitol Hill


I wasn't going to post on Steven Colbert's "testimony" at a House hearing on immigration, but the BREAKING NEWS graphic has informed me that his appearance descended into well-deserved chaos. Michelle Malkin has the dramatic play-by-play

Update: GOP Rep. Steve King delivers a scathing rebuke to Dems/Colbert — defending American workers who do the dirty jobs the Dems/Colbert say they don’t do. Lambastes illegal immigration’s effects on depressed wages, displacement.

Update: Democrat John Conyers wants Colbert to submit written testimony and then leave because he attracted enough attention. Lofgren says no. Dan Lungren takes mic.

Update 10:41am Eastern: Stephen Colbert delivers his comedic routine, mocking law-abiding American workers, cracking jokes about submitting a colonoscopy. Ends his testimony with “USA #1!”

Conyers observes that Colbert’s written testimony differed considerably from the “testimony” he delivered.

This is probably the only time you'll ever see these words at this blog, so feel free to write them down and pass them along: good for John Conyers.

Colbert was there to do one thing: mock American citizens for their very real concerns about the prevalence of illegal immigration (Americans don't object to "regular" legal immigration), despite the efforts of the political and business elite to reorder American labor markets and society through a combination of willful neglect and smug speechifying about this being a "nation of immigrants." Well, liberals and their Republican enablers need to do better than that because the available evidence shows that Americans have every right to be concerned without being labled racists and know-nothings.

One thing Colbert was there to do was repeat the demagogic claim that increased immigration is necessary to do the "jobs Americans won't do." Here's a reality check

  • Of the 465 civilian occupations, only four are majority immigrant. These four occupations account for less than 1 percent of the total U.S. workforce. Moreover, native-born Americans comprise 47 percent of workers in these occupations.

  • Many jobs often thought to be overwhelmingly immigrant are in fact majority native-born:
    • Maids and housekeepers: 55 percent native-born
    • Taxi drivers and chauffeurs: 58 percent native-born
    • Butchers and meat processors: 63 percent native-born
    • Grounds maintenance workers: 65 percent native-born
    • Construction laborers: 65 percent native-born
    • Porters, bellhops, and concierges: 71 percent native-born
    • Janitors: 75 percent native-born

  • There are 93 occupations in which 20 percent or more of workers are immigrants. These high-immigrant occupations are primarily, but not exclusively, lower-wage jobs that require relatively little formal education.

  • There are 23.6 million natives in these high-immigrant occupations (20 percent or more immigrant). These occupations include 19 percent of all native workers.

  • Most natives do not face significant job competition from immigrants; however, those who do tend to be less-educated and poorer than those who face relatively little competition from immigrants.

I'm all for Tea Partying and voting idiots out of office. But, American politics won't be able to repair itself until stunts like this are verboten.

Bad Theater: Tony Kushner Takes On Laura Bush


"Cutting edge" playwright Tony Kushner has written a series of short one-act plays presently gracing the stage in London's West End. One of them features Laura Bush reading The Brothers Karamazov to some dead Iraqi children. If that's the best the most acclaimed playwright of the last 20 years can do, it's no wonder Broadway is struggling:
Tony Kushner is still best known for his epic fantasia Angels in America. But, even in these five short plays imported from the Guthrie Theatre and Berkeley Rep, he reveals his gift for blending the hallucinatory and the political. And, even though the works are variable in quality, collectively they confirm one character's credo that "ambivalence expands our options".

Tony Taccone's production saves the best till last: a playlet, which caused a scandal in America, in which Laura Bush treats a group of dead Iraqi children to a summation of the Grand Inquisitor's speech from The Brothers Karamazov.

But even here Kushner's polemical fury at the Iraq invasion is qualified by his residual sympathy for Mrs Bush. Having mouthed the conventional platitudes in defence of the war, she is shocked into a guilty awareness, telling the imagined children "we will pay for your deaths one way or another".

As performed, powerfully, by Kate Eifrig, the piece leaves you in two minds about its heroine: a part of her identifies with the grand inquisitor's belief in the impossibility of freedom, while another side craves the absolution that Christ's kiss, in Dostoevsky's narrative, bestows.

It just so happens that I have been reading Laura Bush's Spoken From The Heart, and all I can say is Kushner is not fit to shake the former First Lady's hand, let alone write a tired polemic about her. Bush grew up in a modest middle class home in a dusty Texas town. She worked as a teacher and librarian, often working in inner cities, doing the sort of work that liberals say they approve of, but would never really do themselves. Bush knows more about the flora and fauna of her native state than the whinging urban Greens who make up the environmental movement - and she has done more practical work to protect the environment than a thousand Greenpeace drones waving signs. During the Bush years, Laura Bush visited Afghanistan, spoke out in favor of women's rights, and faced a lot more physical danger than Kushner, who mostly has had to face the occasional bad review.

Most important, Laura Bush was an advocate for - you might want to sit down - literature and literacy. She always talked about her favorite books, including Karamazov. She founded the National Book Festival. You would think a literary guy like Kushner would appreciate that, but, no, he uses that to mock her. Compare that to our uninspiring current First Lady who is known for organic gardens, obesity campaigns, and power shopping.

Kushner, I might add, had one critical and popular success; that being Angels In America. That was 20 years ago. Whatever artistry Kushner may have is subsumed by his political astuteness. He picks his topics and controversies to appeal to urban liberals and critics who want to be able to write about Important Statements, rather than cats. The "genius" of Tony Kushner is as carefully cultivated and protected as the "compassion" of Ted Kennedy - who then never had to answer for his many personal failings.

Appropriately, the play is part of a collection of one-acts titled Tiny Kushner. It certainly does take a small man to write such a mean spirited piece about a classy lady who represents the best of America.


Don't Trust Anyone Over 30

San Francisco likes to revel in its self-proclaimed rep as a hotbed of cutting edge, avant-garde art. So, it's funny how many of SF's leading lights are decades-old institutions, with the Sixties the decade to which many trace their origins. Now, the SF Mime Troop - an agit-prop satirical theater group with an undeserved reputation for humor and political insight is celebrating its 50th - yes, 50th - anniversary. That's 50 years of cursing, giant puppet heads, and screeching diatribes about NixonReaganLimbaughGingrichBushPalin. SF Mime Troupe Turns 50

Few American performance companies can boast such longevity, let alone small troupes with no endowment. Who would've thought that an avant-garde arts experiment would become one of the nation's best-known companies within its first decade? That it would launch careers as diverse as those of Peter Coyote, Shabaka and Bill Graham? That a gritty anti-establishment troupe would win a Tony award? Or that mimes could be this vocal?

Actually, the Mime Troupe has hardly ever been silent. From the first performance in 1959 of what was then the R.G. Davis Mime Studio and Troupe - "Mime and Words" - founder Davis tried to signal a distinction between his work and silent mimes like Marcel Marceau. Davis, who studied with Marceau's teacher Étienne Decroux, worked with physically based, or mimetic, acting. Through decades of performing commedia dell'arte and original musicals in the parks, the Mime Troupe has made lots of noise.

It's also changed considerably over the years. Davis' Mime Troupe embodied the progressive turbulence of the '60s, spreading its cultural and political influence on tour. Davis left in 1970 and the company became a collective, as it still is. The troupe of the next three decades, though it continued to tour and mount indoor shows until funding dried up, is best known for its rousing park shows by Holden, director Dan Chumley and composer Bruce Barthol. The 21st century Troupe, exemplified by actor-playwright Michael Gene Sullivan and actors Ed Holmes and Velina Brown, keeps up the struggle to sharpen the collective's message through its summer shows.

"I think the Mime Troupe's job has always been to challenge the accepted stories of American-style capitalism," Sullivan says, taking a break from rehearsals for the customary Fourth of July opening in Dolores Park. The new musical, "Too Big to Fail," focuses on the national addiction to credit, using fables told by a traditional African storyteller to explore "an economy that needs us to be indebted consumers


No one goes to see the Mime Troupe to be enlightened. They just want to see their progressive politics affirmed. Another 50 years should be no problem.

Bad Theater, pt 5

They keep pumping out the anti-Iraq War dramas. Haven't they heard? Bush isn't president anymore! Not only that, we seem to have won the war! D'oh! The latest is 'The Lonely Soldier Monologues (Women at War in Iraq)' which appears to be a "fearless" combination of grim anti-war agitprop and humorless feminist complaining about how tuff it is to be a Woman

Helen Benedict, a journalism professor at Columbia, (emphasis added) has interviewed an assortment of female veterans and constructed “The Lonely Soldier Monologues” from their words. 
Just knowing Benedict's background is enough. You can pretty much guess the tone of this thing.
the bulk of the dialogue is revelatory and disturbing. Sexual harassment and assault by fellow soldiers is a constant theme. Lack of respect is another, and isolation yet another, women still being a small minority of the military population.
Revelatory and disturbing? Right, like no play by a feminist "journalism professor" has ever dealt with the themes of sexual harassment, rape, and "lack of respect!" Really, the hardest part in writing this surely must have been in deciding how best to balance Leftist cliches about the lousy life of soldiers against Feminist cliches about the lousy lives of women. 

This being a play about the Iraq War, Benedict can't resist including a little bit of the Big Lie.

But commendably, the play doesn’t merely ask for equal treatment; it also nods to the particular emotional pressures felt by women in the combat zone, many involving the Iraqi children who would approach soldiers or their convoys.

You’re supposed to run over them,” one soldier laments. “I was a day-care teacher.”

"Supposed to run them over?!" Sez who? This is, frankly, bullshit. It is also a slur against the troops that people like Benedict claim to support. I'd ask to see the source on that little quote, but I can guarantee that the source doesn't exist. Benedict either made it up for dramatic effect (some journalism!), or more likely heard it third hand from someone who heard it from a friend of a friend. That this apparently will go unremarked by her audience is yet another reason not to trust them, or their preferred leaders, in matters of war and peace. 


Bad Theater, pt 4

I don't normally like to do two "Bad Theaters" so close to one another, but 'when Howard Zinn comes to SF with a bunch of actors to read "inspiring passages from "A People's History of the United States," well...

The varied crew, featuring actors Kerry Washington, Josh Brolin, Diane Lane and Benjamin Bratt; hip-hop artist Boots Riley; activist Clarence Thomas; civil rights attorney Renee Maria Saucedo; musicians the Stairwell Sisters; and historian Anthony Arnove, read and sang selections from "Voices of a People's History," the companion volume of first-person accounts plucked from Zinn's 1980 best-seller "A People's History of the United States."
There's some actors whose movies I now know to boycott, except Brolin who appears in movies I simply don't want to see. 

I went to Boston University for a spell when Zinn (along with Elie Weizel) was one of the school's celebrity professors. I even saw him "open" for Abbie Hoffman during some student protests over dorm access, or something. He is about as humorless and grating as any lefty you can imagine. But, somehow, the Beautiful People have annointed him as their Official Historian. 

Unlike many of them, I have actually read the "People's History." It's mostly a hagiography for the various agitators who have tried to bring the US down. Zinn himself is an intellectual leader in the effort to discredit the Constitution for being nothing more than a compact between wealthy planters to protect their financial interests and oppress the People.  That he is one of the intellectual leaders of the country's progressive community is yet another reason not to trust progressives when they profess to "love" their country. How this could be inspiring is beyond me.

This guy also doesn't seem to get it, but from the opposite direction.
Others professed to be die-hard "People's History" fans, like Mike van Dierdonck from Orinda, who teaches it in his classroom. "You try to get kids to a read a book these days," he said, resplendent in a pink tie-dyed shirt. (emphasis added-Ps)
That's because no one wants to hear a bunch of depressing stories about how lousy America is, fool. Zinn and his followers literally believe that we should stop teaching kids about George Washington and the Constitution, and replace them with "brave tales" about Harry Bridges and Eugene Debs. Sorry, but forming a union and going on strike is not in the same league as leading a rebellion against the British Empire. Most folks want to read about THAT Mr. Pink Tye-Dye Shirt.  

Bad Theater, pt 3

You know what we haven't talked about enough? Race in America. Well, we've been busy what with 9/11, the Iraq War, the destruction of the international finance system, and the paternity of Sarah Palin's baby. Really, it was hard enough surviving the "shredding of the Constitution" during the "worst presidency ever." Who had time to discuss race? Anyway, I seem to recall hearing something about race during the first OJ trial. 


Luckily for us playright Tracey Scott Wilson wants to challenge us and get the conversation going again with "The Good Negro."
The play, which begins previews on Tuesday at the Public Theater, imagines a troubled moment in the American civil rights movement, when an act of intolerance leads to riots and hate crimes in Birmingham, Ala., in 1963. Three black leaders try to rally their community, but their efforts are hampered not only by the K.K.K. and the F.B.I., but also by their own classism, infighting and vice.
It's just incredible how modern artists always manage to reduce every historic event - even the Civil Rights Movement! - to the trio of "classism, infighting, and vice." 
By staging laudable characters’ indiscretions, the play confronts what Liesl Tommy, the production’s director, calls “the idea of the good Negro,” which has become especially relevant with Barack Obama’s presidency. “It’s that old standard that in order to be worth something in this country, you can’t be ‘as good.’ You have to be better."

Yet Ms. Wilson’s past and sense of obligation almost kept her from addressing the complexity of civil rights leaders.

“I grew up as a preacher’s kid,” she said, “and King was idolized. Idolized. And I was always told as a child that you don’t air your dirty laundry. It was ‘Don’t throw it out there, because white people already think the worst of us.’”

Good advice that. Why bother having heroes at all? And, just so you know, the fact that there is a black American president, and American culture has developed to the point where a black woman can get a play produced in NYC with glowing support from the NY Times, does NOT mean that we must stop picking at the scab of racism. 

“We had some people who had been interested in the play say that it wasn’t relevant anymore because Obama was doing well,” Ms. Wilson said.

At that, Ms. Tommy chuckled, threw up her hands and said: “We were like: ‘What? Because Obama’s doing well, there’s no more racism?’ ”

Leaning forward, Ms. Wilson began, “The idea of ‘postracial’ to me is —— ”

“—— a fantasy," Ms. Tommy interjected.

Ms. Wilson added: “An insane fantasy. Like a ‘Star Wars’ fantasy. Racism is not going to end just because we have a black president. Real equality will come when black people can mess up just like white people and still succeed, and when a flaw in a black leader is not looked at as a flaw in the black race."

No one expects racism to "end" because of Barack Obama. But, some of us imagined that the endless b****ing about racism might have been rendered mute for at least a little while. Sounds like we need to be prepared for another few decades' worth of griping. 

Bad Theater, pt 2

Michael Phillis' play 'Dolls' is about ... DOLLS!

The dolls in Phillis' new play are the means through which the viewer learns about their owner, an older gay man named Frank. Some of the dolls have been with Frank since his childhood; others are newer. They take on Frank's character traits - including a love of "CSI" and unhealthy snack foods - and they're all a little bit gay.
A little bit gay! Yes! Just innocent fun! But, be warned. Phillis' tale is one with dark edges: 
But while the dolls come to resemble their owner, and also follow the four doll rules - including "never let them see you move" and "even if you don't like the game, you still have to play" - they also have their own identities, independent of Frank. There's a caste system among them, and they deal with real-world issues like politics, war and civil liberties infringements.
"Civil liberties infringements" is Playwright Code for: "This is life during wartime in George W Bush's America." But, you should know that Phillis struggled mightily with his muse.  
"Once the idea had really (taken shape) ... it was almost like, wow, I can do anything with this idea," Phillis says. "And then right after that great realization, there was the, oh, my gosh, what am I going to do?"
Luckily for Phillis he always has Old Reliable to sell tix. 




A Bad Night At the Theater

Now that the Iraq War has effectively been won - and art depicting US soldiers as (1) psychopaths (2) losing a war has been soundly rejected by the public - the artistic left is desperately searching for ever more jaundiced ways of looking at the defining events of the last 8 years. The latest is Time Stands Still" by David Margulies, who says "This is not an Iraq play." Well, let's roll the tape: 

James (David Harbour) is a principled war correspondent recovering from a breakdown occasioned by an overexposure to the misery and gore of armed conflict. Sarah (Anna Gunn), his injured lover, begins to question the ethics of her profession as she recuperates from the explosion that killed the Iraqi driver with whom she happened to be having an affair.
Sounds like fun! Lest you think this is some kind of underfunded coffeehouse production, be aware that Alicia Silverstone is featured as the "bubbly" lover of a friend of the Miserables. Ahh, the spirit of youth! Here's a picture from the production:



There's a word for what's going on here: ACTING!

The woman on crutches was a photographer in Iraq, and apparently the play spends a lot of time discussing "why Sarah does what she does, and whether it is a moral act to bear witness to suffering, or an abdication of human suffering"
“The camera’s there to record life,” Sarah says. “Not change it.”
I'm thinking this means they come down on the side of "it is a moral act to bear witness." I assume no one asks whether it is a moral act to go to a warzone; loudly trumpet every piece of news that reflects badly on the US military and underreport any good news; publicly declare the war "lost" and demand that the US military withdraw immediately, regardless of the consequences for the people left behind; and then, when victory is snatched from the jaws of defeat, do little more than write crappy little plays about the pity of it all. 

Next. please. 


Best Retirement Invesments Auto Search