If You've Lost Walter Cronkite...

Make of this what you like: the NY Times notoriously lefty op-ed columnists are pretty much united in their scorn towards the Obama Administration today:


Barack Obama prides himself on consensus, soothing warring sides into agreement. But the fury directed at the robber barons by the robbed blind in America has been getting hotter, not cooler. And that’s because the president and his Treasury secretary have been coddling the Wall Street elite, fretting that if they curtail executives’ pay and perks too much, if they make the negotiations with those who siphoned our 401(k)’s too tough, the spoiled Sherman McCoys will run away, the rescue plan will fail and the markets will wither. (Now that Mr. Obama has made $8,605,429 on his books — including $500,000 for letting his memoir be condensed into a kids’ book — maybe he’s lost touch with his hole-in-the-shoe, hole-in-the-Datsun, have-not roots.)

President Obama missed a huge teaching opportunity with A.I.G. Those bonuses were an outrage. The public’s anger was justified. But rather than fanning those flames and letting Congress run riot, the president should have said: “I’ll handle this.”

He should have gone on national TV and had the fireside chat with the country that is long overdue. That’s a talk where he lays out exactly how deep the crisis we are in is, exactly how much sacrifice we’re all going to have to make to get out of it, and then calls on those A.I.G. brokers — and everyone else who, in our rush to heal our banking system, may have gotten bonuses they did not deserve — and tells them that their president is asking them to return their bonuses “for the sake of the country.”

Had Mr. Obama given A.I.G.’s American brokers a reputation to live up to, a great national mission to join, I’d bet anything we’d have gotten most of our money back voluntarily. Inspiring conduct has so much more of an impact than coercing it. And it would have elevated the president to where he belongs — above the angry gaggle in Congress.

Frank Rich: Has a ‘Katrina Moment’ Arrived?

A CHARMING visit with Jay Leno won’t fix it. A 90 percent tax on bankers’ bonuses won’t fix it. Firing Timothy Geithner won’t fix it. Unless and until Barack Obama addresses the full depth of Americans’ anger with his full arsenal of policy smarts and political gifts, his presidency and, worse, our economy will be paralyzed. It would be foolish to dismiss as hyperbole the stark warning delivered by Paulette Altmaier of Cupertino, Calif., in a letter to the editorpublished by The Times last week: “President Obama may not realize it yet, but his Katrina moment has arrived.”

Writing on his blog, Paul Krugman has repeatedly expressed his despair at the administration's various proposals to "fix" the banks (see the post below this one). 

It's not that these are critical per se. It's that they are directed squarely at Obama and the Democrats in DC. There's no more lazy Bush bashing. Rich is no longer making snide cracks about Sarah Palin's shopping habits. Friedman makes a half-hearted stab at the GOP, but he knows that this is not where the problem lies. 

No doubt, Obama sees this as nothing more than the temporary panic of supporters who will rally 'round when things perk up. After all, Reagan famously "stayed the course" in the face of a hostile media and panicked supporters. Unfortunately, there is very little evidence of a "course" for Obama to stay on. 

Best Retirement Invesments Auto Search